An Analysis of Joseph Nye’s Use of “Soft Power” and its Relationship wi

An Analysis of Joseph Nyes Use of Soft advocator and its Relationship with Morality in Inter national Relations Recently, the United States has woolly a great deal of world indicant in the international vault of heaven because of its invasion of Iraq and torture of prisoners of war. The United States holds an incredible edge in armed forces capabilities over any other nation and the US benefits from the largest economy in the world. In a world where there is one single superpower, wherefore is that superpower unable to force-feed policy through coercion or payoff? Theoretic everyy, the US ought to be able to rule the world with a double-edged sword of military muscle and economic supremacy. These tangible aspects of power should be all that US needs to be the prevailing globose power, yet it obviously lacks some x-factor if its military and economic preponderance has re chief(prenominal)ed and the US has lost power. Traditionally, State power has been viewed without concern f or holiness. In most accounts, piety did not play a role in power, or reacted counterproductively towards power. The main school of thought in International Relations on the archetype of State power, realism, is founded on self-interest and follows the mantra might makes right. The Realists believe that a nation should only act in a manner which enhances or advances its own national interest at all costs despite morality and the interests of other nations. A nation cannot successfully navigate the muddy amniotic fluid of International Relations by waging war and imposing trade sanctions upon all of those who oppose that nation. The second viewpoint on State power is ground purely in morality. Idealism requires self sacrifice for the overall just of the global community. Physical power should perform as ... ...attackindex.htmMcKillen, Elizabeth. The Unending strike down Over Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations. Diplomatic History. Nov. (2003) 711-716.Nye, Joseph S. Jr. Bound to Lead. new(a) York fundamental Books, Inc., 1990.---. The Changing Nature of World Power. Political Science Quarterly. 105(2) (1990) 177-192.---. The Paradox of American Power. New York Oxford UP, 2002.---. Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs. Sept.-Oct. (1998) 81-95.---. Redefining the topic Interest. Foreign Affairs. July-Aug. (1999) 22-30.---. Soft Power. New York Public Affairs, 2004.---. The velvet hegemon How soft power can help defeat terrorism. Foreign Policy. May-June (2003) 74-75.Rothgeb, John M. Jr. formation Power Influence and Force in the Contemporary International System. New York St. Martin Press, 1993.