Tuesday, May 21, 2019
Mediation â⬠Foundations
The organization NAFAAS is an acronym for the National Association of Fine and Applied Arts Students. It is a trunk that oversees the welfare of its members the fine and applied arts students. It presents intricate issues as violation of students right to the department, organize social activities and exhibitions, and engage in educational tours and visits. It is also vested with the responsibility of raising and nurturing capable leaders to promote the art culture. The body is organized and governed by the following elected officers The President, the Vice-President, Secretary General, Financial Secretary, the Treasurer, manager of Socials, Director of Sports and the Curator.The members are all duly matriculated students of the University. They pay an annual registration fee to the body and attend general mergings when they are summ mavind.The conflictA mistaking ensured when it was time to utilize some money from the bodys account. The financial secretary has issued about a th ousand receipts and handed over fin hundred compensations to the treasurer. The treasurer recorded the given amount and the receipts. Unknown to the treasurer, the financial secretary went to change the figures to reflect a collection of a thousand payment and receipt.The president was to organize a welcome party for the associations freshers only to discover that the money reflecting in the account differ greatly from the one recorded. An executive meeting was immediately summoned and the figures were laid based on the records. After more than deliberation, the financial secretary and the treasurer were asked to account and pay for the loss other than they be sanctioned with expulsion.For precisely two weeks, they could non see eye-to-eye. This called for another meeting.Third party.The curator, supported by the two-third majority of the house, moved the motion for a meeting and a meeting day was fixed. The agenda of course was to discuss and if possible to resolve the differen ces between the two executive members. The session lasted for about two hours with modify debate and arguments. The meeting was adjourned without a reasonable gain ground on how best to resolve the conflict. A third party was agreed upon unanimously the Patron of the association. He was actually the best to resolve the conflict as the parties involved treasurer, financial secretary respects him so much, besides he is the first patron of the association.The mediation At a pre-determined date and time, the mediator the patron and the two parties involved in the conflict met at the Associations secretariat. Then and there, the patron listened patiently as they both recount their role in the incident. The mediator, being a trained one observed the starts and stops, the inconsistency of the financial secretary tactfully asked why are the figures in correcting fluid? the financial secretary by surprise responded no and later I dont know. This question is supposed to stick been tell t o the treasurer being that he handles the recorded amount.The subsequent questions, responses and gestures were all geared towards the mediator trying to facilitate solution progress. He tried as much as possible to cool the tensed atmosphere a situation where no progress can be actualized. Further issues were raised about the scorn of the treasurer for keeping important and formal documents at such trivial places.After much deliberation, a solution was lastly reached. This was basically because of the status of and for the patron, other than the financial secretary already pre-determine he would negate all proposition that would subsequently lead to the findings at least on a short term. The thinking of the mediator the patron also did help matters. Emotion was deeply mixed with fact and the resultant effect was felt in the change of atmosphere. The financial secretary was finally willing to co-operate and let the cat out of the bag.He confessed to both the patron and the trea surer that he was deeply sorry for the incident and the conflict. Later on, he was powerfully advised by the patron never to perpetrate such act. The treasurer and the patron forgave him. The sessions lasted for roughly two hours, thirty-five munites and were advised to go about their unremarkable activities without any mistrust. They also agreed never to share with any other person executives inclusive how it was resolved or who actually was at fault.If I were the mediator, I would have made it a caucus interrogation. First, I would get background information from reliable sources about their attitudes and behaviors. This first hand research may or may not contribute towards knowing who actually was at fault or mediating them. After which I would personally interrogate them. I would facilitate solution progress by making relevant interrogations, delving deep into relevant issues that will sum up o the overall purpose mediation.After all efforts made and I do not get to the route of the matter, I may if I have, decide to fund the repay for peaces sake. If I do not have the money, I will at my possible best try to convince them to tell the truth. I will remind them of their original willingness to resolve the totally issue. Then proceed to advice and chide against future occurrence. This I believe will make them want to resolve it all. I will also strongly warn that all discussions towards the process of mediation be treated as top secret for indeed they are.References Dr. Mickey S. (2002). Mediation Foundations. Background information. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from www.essaywriters.net
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment